Post JSON to Nodejs from Angularjs

I'm struggling with the title of this post as I searched many ways but couldn't find something simple like this.
If you have any other name suggestions I'm totally open!
Here goes.

I wanted to send JSON from an AngularJS app and get it on my NodeJS side so I could do something with the data.

There may be better ways (Socket.IO anyone?) but here goes:

Here is my angularJS service:


And here is my nodejs page:

Install express, and body-parser (I think that's about all) and you should be able to send a message using
$message.create({ }); // That's a JSON object being passed in
Simple AngularJS controller

And Finally a simple HTML page for it.

Good Luck!
I hope that helps SOMEONE out there.

Control your Network Connected Devices

Today I want to tell you about a little epiphany I had a few weeks back. I realized that I could connect firebase to a local nodejs server and a public facing website, and control my roku.

Most people read this and think....well duh you can already control your roku using your phone. At this time (please prove me wrong) you need to be on your Intranet. Your Intranet is the network in your house that your roku is on, so basically you have to be on the same wifi as your roku.

This means you can setup a website using firebase to authenticate you, connect to a common data point in your database and now control things in your house from ANYWHERE as long as both have an internet connection. So I could be in Hong Kong and change the channel on my roku.

Ok, big deal why should I care? Well what if I told you that your roku isn't the only device that connects to the internet? You can query for all these devices, setup commands for them, and control them from anywhere! Forgot a light on in the house when you left? With (some) devices you can check the status and turn it off/on. This kinda makes that whole "internet" of things a lot closer to reality without completely opening up your network, the only "failure" point here is if your firebase gets hacked or something.

But you want code....

https://github.com/onaclovtech/MediaController

Here is the side that runs in your house (and you could also just run this on a raspberry pi or something instead of a dedicated full blown computer).

Right now I have my own rolled roku controller, but I think there is one in npm already that I haven't checked out. You can control your Chromecast this way. Possibly smart tv's etc.


Details for the people who are interested:

Node Side:
1. Start server
2. Server does a query for network devices and adds them to a list.
3. Server pushes list to myfirebaseurl/mediadevices
4. Server then sets up a callback to trigger when a child changes (state specifically).
5. Server sets up functions to handle deleting devices in mediadevices when it closes (this is to ensure that the devices are always accessible).

AngularJS side:
1. Connect to myfirebaseurl/mediadevices
2. Associate NG model to a dropdown (that's how I'm swapping between, if you have other ideas I'd love to hear them).
3. When a button is pressed, it looks at which device is selected and changes it's state to whatever mode that button is designed to accomplish.
4. If the server is removed then mediadevices is empty and the dropdown goes away.




Let me know what you think! If you have a chromecast, amazontv, etc that you want to build this on, or want to lend me to build it on, lemme know I'd love to chat!

Tyson

Can we make web apps less reliant on network?

So I was thinking a little about how I was using bootstrap for some of my sites, and with it being a pretty commonly used code across sites it got me thinking.

Could we somehow share these resources across domains reducing the need to download, which causes us to slow things down normally.

Here is my thought.

When parsing a .html file you come across a script tag with a src a la

script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/angular.js/1.2.6/angular.min.js"

When it downloads the file it (maybe?) puts it in memory so it can be used (I could be wrong here).

What I was thinking is that we maybe generate a key value store, and it does something like this:

{"https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/angular.js/1.2.6/angular.min.js", "pointer to memory that this resides"}

Now instead of simply downloading a .js file, it looks at the lookup (or hash table) and finds that that EXACT path file exists in memory and just uses that instead of downloading the file again.

Caveats.

1. I don't know if it would be possible to modify that memory.
2. I wouldn't expect this caching to be indefinite, but should be do-able across pages during an active session.

As long as the downloaded data isn't capable of being modified in memory, then doing a string lookup in a local hash *should* give us a decent startup decrease because we don't need to re-download the file(s) and I can't see how we would have any problems with safety/security since you're literally using the exact same file as you downloaded earlier, you just don't need to re-download.

I'm sure I'm missing something here, but I would think that this should be possible. Got any ideas? hit me up on twitter (@onaclov2000) or leave a comment here

Movies Oh My

I've been a busy boy.

In my quest to generate a boatload of Angular Services (for angularjsservices.com, dont hate the site it is terrible, if you want to help build it let me know!).

I wrote up another library but this time for my movies.

https://github.com/onaclovtech/movielibrary

The cool thing here is I built a rottentomatoes.js angular service for it.

https://github.com/onaclovtech/rottentomatoes

I got it all nice looking and then discovered omdbapi and guess what? now we have one for that too.

https://github.com/onaclovtech/omdbapi

You can substitute them and get your data.

Now the bad news. (but potentially good news).

The JSON returned is different between the two. So something I'm thinking about that would be really slick is if we could essentially take the format from each and push the data to a title,picture,etc variables, then we simply return our search and it contains an object with the appropriate fields in a standard location. I think this would be huge for ALL of my Angular Services to basically build a JSON format that will be consistent, and the service will manage converting.

If you're interested in helping out with coming up with standards for this I would love it. If you're interested in helping build angularjsservices to what it SHOULD be, I would love that.

In the mean time I'm building building building.

Join me and build an angular service too? (trust me they're surprisingly easy, and they make using angular even more fun)

I'm using Firebase to store off the data just like my book library. Firebase sure is handy.

While playing with this I realized something....I can control my roku with a webpage and I don't need chrome's special stuff (that the chromecast is using) I can just use a local nodejs server and firebase and host my site anywhere. I will be working on that next. Can you figure out how to do it? I think I've given some good hints :)

Emailster

+

+

=

Emailster

Today I'm planning to talk about SendGrid, AngularJS and FireBase. SendGrid is an email delivery service which supports a REST based interface for sending emails to customers, FireBase manages JSON data and syncing that data between clients really fast. Finally AngularJS provides us with a client side framework that has great databinding and is pretty fast and easy to use.

My goal was to make a client side only app and send emails from it as well as determine the validity of those email addresses.

I created a service called email and it's located in a file called sendgrid.js.

Now in theory anyone who can manage sending emails via REST or other web technology can be inserted in place as long as the function prototypes match. In this case I have a function called "send" that takes the parameters of api key/user, who the message is going to, what the subject is, what the body will say, and who the message is from. I'm working on a site called angularjsservices.com which I hope to collect all these services we can interchange and use for creating amazing client side only applications.

I am marrying Firebase by keeping track of what emails are valid, AngularJS to manage routing for the Firebase "ID" the user is assigned and setting it's validity in Firebase.

The whole reason I came up with this idea was because sometimes you have an idea you want to see if there is interest for. So you want to collect valid emails, or you want to give something away if someone provides a valid email address, this can be accomplished using these client side only technologies.

In Firebase I create a data structure like this:

{
  email: jon@doe.com,
  name: Jon Doe,
  valid: false
}

Next I setup routing in angularjs

webpage.com/:id

where :id is the firebase data element.

So now we can do something like this

firebaseurl.com/:id

to point to the specific firebase entity.

When the user clicks on their link webpage.com/:id it sets the validity of the email to true:
it becomes this:

{
  email: jon@doe.com,
  name: Jon Doe,
  valid: true
}

And there you have it, you can collect emails from a client side only application.

API Key and User
When you make a REST call to SendGrid it's passes your API Key and User in plain text, when you have a server application it's not *nearly* as big of a deal, however when you have a client side ONLY application, this becomes a big problem since your API Key and User are the User/Password to SendGrid's website.
I have a few suggestions. The first is Stop using the same User/Password as your API key, and allow you to generate new ones if you happen to require changing yours. This would prevent people from running off with your keys and logging in and changing settings. It would also allow you to change it if someone decided to grab your API Key and user in your client side only app and start using them. The second thing that could happen is similar to FireBase you could enable security settings for requests from specific domains. This solves the API Key and User name in the client side only app because we'll only be able to "send" and email if you're ON that domain. Either way splitting the API Key and User from the login credentials is a critical issue for me (and if I'm wrong PLEASE PLEASE let me know and I'd be happy to update this post).

XMLHttpRequest
Second is that when you make a REST post using my Angular Service I get a XMLHttpRequest cannot load [sent REST message url]  The 'Access-Control-Allow-Origin' header has a value ... that is not equal to the supplied origin. Origin 'null' is therefore not allowed access. If you click on the link the value in the browser says this:
{"message":"success"}

Which I find very surprising since it appears I got an error, I'm not sure if this is a mistake on my side or theirs, but either way I am able to send a message successfully so somethings up here. Again please contact me if you're able to help out.

You can see the application as it is here:
https://github.com/onaclovtech/Emailster
I'll slowly be cleaning it up and making it fancier, but I really wanted to show it off right away!


What other apps can we make that traditionally require a server side component, but we can write as client side only now?

Depth First vs Breadth First programming and stubbing

Originally I wanted to title this saying TDD instead of stubbing, but really the reason this topic came up is due to chatting with a friend about writing dummy functions to get TDD to pass, which lead to me commenting that sometimes I want to stub something out so I can say "well let's pretend that works" and move on and get the code I'm actively working, on working.

Breadth First Programming Style
This style of programming is writing the highest level (user facing we'll call it) code first, any calls to functions that should do something or get data or whatever should be quickly written as stubs with something to get you moving in your current function. The next step is moving into the first (or last depending on the order you'd like to go) and managing that functionality. If that calls down into nested functions then you follow the same organization, finish all the functions at the n-1 level of your earlier function and go on.

Depth First Programming Style
This style of programming is writing code that always works at each step. If you start writing and you come across a function you need, you simply drop down and implement it, and if that has functions it calls, you do the same. This keeps happening until you've finished everything down to the bottom, when you move up you do the same thing on the next function until you finally reach the top level and move along again.

Mixed Style
I like to work in a Mixed style. When you're working a complicated algorithm on your main thread of work it makes sense to say, well lets assume we get this data correctly and move on and continue working the algorithm, however if it's a relatively easy problem to solve and dropping into the function the function is a bear, it might make more sense to just implement that function first then move back up to your higher level.

TDD Aside
Since I brought it up I should talk a little about TDD. TDD is to me more of a Depth First style of programming. You write up a test, then you implement a high level of it, and yay it passes, then you write another test and drop back down to the function level you were at and "fix it" and keep doing that. I almost would compare this to a Yo-Yo strategy, you start at the top with a test, and throw your Yo-Yo, then when it gets all the way through the pass you start again at the top. You don't move forward until things are as right as you can make them.

How do you work what is your style? What do you think TDD is like? Are there any other programming styles you can think of  in this context?

Ordered Entry of Form Data UX

As a follow up to this post: Stacking Enabled/Disabled States

I am going to show you a working example.



So now when combobox selected index changes it disables and clears all the form fields AFTER textbox1 (so textbox2, and button1)

Additionally you could set up a similar situation for adding data to comboboxes. If you enter in some data and move to the next field, you could call the same thing and have function pointers for the data on the "next" item in the list (so instead of pointing to 2 down you point to 1 down the list).

Good luck and do you have any tips for Ordered Entry of Form data?

Stacking Enabled/Disabled States

I get annoyed when working with forms that require data to be entered in steps, this is usually how the code works.

1. Write a "on changed" event handler for the field.
2. When fired Set all fields below to disabled.
3. Enable only the next field.
4. Repeat.

All I can think about here is DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) but how can we accomplish it?

I'm thinking you build an ordered list of all the fields, then when an on change event handler fires, it finds where your field is in the list, and disables all below it. So from there you simply make ONE function call in ALL cases, and pass it your current field, it'll then follow the rules.

What do you think? How do you manage ordered data entry and how you select appropriate fields?

I'll try implementing this and when I finish I will post here what my results were (pains/gains).

This is a rough idea, (not an actual implementation, but should be very close)

Using zip on the command line

I was trying to find zip on the command line, I don't know all the parameters that are available. However, a little guessing I added -r but anywho, this is the command.

zip -r filename.zip foldername

That's it.

Good luck

How Did I Get Here

I blogged for work.....that's crazy right?

Check it out.

http://aerospace.honeywell.com/blog/how-did-i-get-here-my-path-to-honeywell

Saving user data without requiring login

Saving users data without requiring a login can be a tricky problem, but with firebase and a framework that supports routing it doesn't have to be.

I have a friend who has a site called http://www.infantchart.com/. He mentioned one time that people don't like to have to login, or link to a google account so they can save their data. I think we've done this so many times and we understand the reasoning why, that it was hard to understand why someone wouldn't want to do that.

I have been playing with Firebase a ton, and I love it. Just last night I wrote a VERY simple app that adds elements to my data store. I had nearly forgotten that when I add a JSON object to my store, it'll generate a unique id (like a primary key in a typical database). Having worked with Angular JS, I know you can use routing pretty easily. So I now have a solution for his problem.  When a user enters in some data, generate a "new" key for them, and redirect to that page for any further input. Now when the user visits infantchart.com/[unique id from firebase] using the ability to route, you simply open a firebase connection to [firebaseurl]/[uniqueid]

How do we get the user to go to that site though? They're probably not going to remember HvawoinvNOINRV to be able to get to their data. Adding a "share" option and really highlight it so they share with friends, this will attract new visitors, as well as help them find their way back. More than likely if they can't remember the path, they'll remember they shared it with friends and find the link that way. Additionally you can store that unique id into local storage so when they visit from the same device it automatically goes to the right link, this way they can always find their way back.

Giving users the ability to save their data without having to actually login/link will help retention and reuse, resulting in a more useful site and a little more intuitive I'd like to think.

Disclaimer: Don't use this approach for sensitive data since finding other peoples data is a matter of cycling through different combinations (it might be a pain and hard to find stuff, but it's not impossible).

Do you have other ways to save user data without requiring a login, love to hear about em in the comments.

The Passionate Programmer

I found this to be a pleasant book with a lot of useful tips to improve how you approach your job as a career.

The Passionate Programmer

I've really enjoyed reading this, and highly recommend the book!

How do we stop loved ones from clicking on spam/phishing links?

Do not let them ever get the links.

Problem

Ok I am just being a little facetious. I have kind of grown up on the internet, I am suspicious of all kinds of things (and I am sure I make mistakes all the time), but there are some cases that are just so obvious. However, here is the problem I have, things that are obvious to me, are not obvious to everyone. 

Is there a reason that in the history of your email, you have NEVER sent a link to Botox to your friends, in fact, you have NEVER sent an email to ALL your friends, nor have you sent the same email (or close enough) to EACH of your friends in different emails? I am willing to bet you have not sent the same email (or similar) to more than 10 friends in your contacts which falls into the HUNDREDs or possibly even THOUSANDS.

Solutions

Send filter

Google reads your inbox, Yahoo reads your inbox, and the NSA reads your inbox. I suspect they read your outbox too. Why not read them for good too.

What I propose is that the companies who are sending the email do a simple filter. IF we are trying to send links to a BUNCH of people, OR multiple emails of the same link to a bunch of people, we just simply hold onto the email, and wait a few days. Simply popping up a notification probably will not help, since the person who hacked the account would just as likely hit "OK". However, if you leave it in your sent box with a reminder for say 3 days (this should be enough as MOST people check their email at least 1 time in 3 days), that says "Hey you sent this email to a bunch of people x days ago, I can still cancel it if you'd like". 

Alternately, we could add some kind of are you a real person test (CAPTCHA), so now instead of sending 100 emails all at once, (or say more than 3) you have to put in a CAPTCHA for every so many, which would slow down anyone sending spam. Make it a poor enough Return on Investment (ROI) for the spammer, but a sufficient enough ROI for the person legitimately sending emails.

Training

Suppose whenever a link comes through that *might* be a spam account, before you can look at the email, you have to do some kind of training (this is along the lines of PhishMe, but it is not corporate guided, so this is more "inform the masses"). Once you finish the training, we could HIGHLIGHT links with big arrows that say "THIS MIGHT BE SPAM OR SOMETHING NOT GOOD, WE DON'T RECOMMEND CLICKING".

How would this help?

Prevention

Each of the email providers has to scan each email as it arrives for spamminess. (Yes, I just made this word up). Imagine if instead of having to parse 300 incoming emails, it only has to parse one outgoing, deemed it as spam, and never sent it (of course there would be ways to work around this, but basically it should involve more work than spammers a spammers Return on Investment). Cut it off at the source, less outgoing spam means less incoming spam, and it is a multiplier when you stop it at the source.

Knowledge

People who don't understand safe browsing behavior will either be prevented from even being able to click on links from people they trust (but who weren't sent from people they trust), or simply make it really obvious when you might be subjected to Spam. By informing them repeatedly, it might just become second nature.

Hope you had a fun time reading this.

I would love to hear your feedback.

Convert Hidden text to Regular Text Word 2007

Came across a problem this morning converting Hidden text in word 2007 to normal text.

1. Enable the hidden text

 a. windows ribbon, start menu, word options

b. Select Display, then Make sure Hidden Text is selected:


2. On the ribbon, in the editing box (typically far right), select the select drop down, then Select Text with Similar Formatting.

3. On the ribbon in the styles box click the arrow with the bar above it

    and select clear formatting

There you go, now you know how to clear the formatting, there are some other ways floating around the internet explaining how to make hidden text normal text, but they didn't work for me. This worked.

Good luck and let me know if you find any other solutions that are easier (short cut keys would be awesome too).

Localstorage using AngularJS

I found a really nice demo app (and associated .js file as a service) at http://gregpike.net/demos/angular-local-storage/demo/demo.html

Unfortunately when I went to update my app recently, I noticed that my localstorage was getting clobered for some reason.

I after bringing up the debugger and stepping through, I found out that when the $watch was being called on the demo values, it was passing value as a null value. Now as to why this was happening I don't know, however to fix it I reverted from $watch to ng-change, so here's how.

(if you're literally using his page identically, then do a view page source and we'll move from there):
Here is the before:

And here is the after:
Note:
I added an ng-change attribute to the input field. Then in the controller, I added a call to update the variables we want to use, and added a function called change, inside that function I attempt to store the data (as before) and update the variable we are using for our text (as before).

If you've been having problems getting localStorage to work hopefully this will get you moving along.

5 ways to think more like an Engineer

1. Read Technical Documentation.
If you write software, read about new languages, or techniques. If you design buildings, learn about new techniques, materials.

2. Read Context Documentation.
Understand your customer, when you see the pain points of customers, you can understand better how to solve the problems they are experiencing.

3. Think Wider.
If you are trying to solve a problem, try to solve it in more than one way. Aim to meet the same end result with each option. Look at how each can work for and against your end goal.

4. Be social, share
Talk to other engineers, particularly others that are always furthering their knowledge, sometimes you'll find that they understood a subject differently than you, which is good, this gives you another view. Also if you share stuff you build, you might find others are interested in helping out, and show you new ways to solve your current problems.

5. Test your assumptions.
Create a hypothesis about everything you do, and then prove your hypothesis is correct. Do this one day a week. Whether its writing code, simulating the tensile strength of a set of materials you're considering using. Find ways to prove that your understanding of the system is right, even if you are 'certain' you're right. See if you can 'break' what you thought was a certainty.

Good luck, do you have any other ideas of How to think more like an engineer? Share them in the comments.

Xbox Kinect, google glass

What if we took an Xbox Kinect, scanned an entire room then we proceeded to design the room in a 3d modeling system where the wall hangings, furniture, etc are already integrated. when the time comes to implement, you put your glasses on you look at the wall and you see the holes and you proceed to drill holes or hammer in the nails.

Moving furniture into place is as easy as looking down, and adjusting to match what you see in your glasses. I think the Kinect will have to be involved in some way to match your orientation to the room and head position etc cetera.

What if we incorporated blue prints into this design builders could see the wall that will be built and see where wires will go as well as where things will go eventually.  homeowners even might know where power lines are for safe drilling if the blueprints are made available.

I really want Google glass to provide true value and actually be an extension of ourselves not a pure consumption device. What ideas do you have that glass what allow you to produce things easier and consume less. And by consume and produce I mean providing real true value to other human beings not shallow status updates.

Keeping Track

So I have a problem, If you work at a large corporation you just might understand. When I come up with something I want to do, that is out of the norm, I frequently get a "talk to X or Y" recommendation.

That leads to talk to A or B recommendation, and on and on, sometimes multiple levels deep.

I had an epiphany today, MIND MAP, so now I center the mind map with the topic I'm looking into, then I map the name(s) of who told me to talk to someone, then map them, so eventually you get a nice map of who you've talked to (and I'll usually note a date, or whatnot), and who you haven't.

This has the added benefit that if you come across a similar situation, you *might* be able to get away with chasing down the individual at the end of the map, not at the beginning (unless that's taboo, and you're supposed to follow the chain, but come on, who does that? We just want to get stuff done).

Good luck.

Tyson

Angular And Firebase Routing and Small Data Sets

I was learning how to use Firebase with Angular recently, and I ran into a problem, when I asked a question on stack overflow I received an answer basically saying to call firebaseurl/ of the data, well I can get the index, but I wasn't sure how my second controller could get that data ( so when my router swapped to the new page, I didn't know how to get it). Thanks to a generous soul at Open Hack last night, we discovered $routeParams, apparently when you use :id in your router config, when you use $routeParams in your "new" controller, you can access whatever that : was, so in this case $routeParams.id gave me the id, which is precisely what I needed. 

I just wanted to point this out in case anyone else had issues. So long story short,

First Page had this:
<a href="http://www.blogger.com/blogger.g?blogID=4424951240484003947#/blah/{{index}}">Blah </a>(Where index is my id)

the router config looked like this

path="/blah/:id"

the "new controller" added a reference to $routeParams (like where we reference firebase, just add a comma and go).
Then I did

"firebaseurl" + $routeParams.id to capture a smaller set of data.

On Government Involvement with Hardware Standards

I asked Phil (@civissmith, +Phil Smith ) if I could repost his email on my blog, I thought it was a very coherent argument to the Government getting involved and forcing manufacturers to follow certain standards (Read: USB Plug on Phones). Enjoy! If you have anything to say about it, I(we) would love to hear!

In regards to our conversation yesterday about the EU and whether micro-USB is required in new devices:
The latest news I could find about the subject is that, at this point, it is still only a working consortium. The EU parliament has made a proposition to start working towards formalizing a law, but as of 26-Sep-13, there does not seem to be anything official [1].

As it stands, manufacturers in the EU have voluntarily agreed to work towards a common goal but there is no legal requirement. Even without formal legislation, Apple is apparently accommodating the EU market by releasing a micro-USB to Lightning port adapter [2]. This sets up a very interesting situation. On the one hand, an engineering team has designed and implemented a product and on the other, a non-technical governing body is pushing towards making a different, licensed technology a standard. I believe this is a very dangerous situation - the government is about to start driving design.

Let's take this out of the context of Apple vs. "the world", mostly because Apple is not the only manufacturer to create their own charging system. This is the cable used to charge my Toshiba Excite tablet [3]. Instead let's look at the underlying question, should a government body even be considering this legislation? If governments become involved at this level, I fear that technology will ultimately be hampered because the people constraining the design would be unfamiliar with how to create new technology - in some cases, they may not even be familiar with current technologies.

The prima facie appeal of the law is that it will reduce consumer waste and enhance ease-of-use. While, I agree that these ends are admirable, let's examine the means. A company is designing new "radio equipment device" to compete with the latest generation. During the design phase, this legislation would require the company to use USB as their power connector. This means the company must pay somewhere between US $1,750 US $4,000 per year just to carry the USB logo [4]. If the device is designed to have any media playback capability through a cabled interface, then the company must design a second interface. The device that could have had it's own hardware interface designed to do all in one must now ship with two cables - one USB and one proprietary. This scenario would be asking for consumer waste. Let's assume that the company doesn't want to run the risk of designing a second, proprietary interface. The media playback would then most likely have to be the de facto media standard, HDMI. To implement the HDMI solution will cost the company US $10,000 annually plus a per-unit royalty fee [5]. The saddest part of this scenario is that a device that could have done all of this in one cable must now use two. It's inter-operable, but is that easier to use?

This legislation will also only push the waste from the consumer level up to the manufacturer level. Nothing in consumer electronics is made-to-order which means that HDMI cables and USB cables will still be produced at a certain capacity until trend data suggests that manufacturing should slow down. The end result is still thousands or millions of surplus cables. The only real difference is that the cables never made it to consumers to be thrown away, instead they were thrown out by the manufacturers when a newer interface came along and the antiquated equipment was no longer needed. But speaking of newer interfaces, what does the legislation do to technology growth?

The current USB 2.0 specification only allows for a maximum data transfer rate of 480 Mbs [6]. As technologies get faster and data storage gets cheaper, it's a logical conclusion that 480 Mbs will eventually be too slow to be usable by the average consumer - look at what happened to the 14.4 kbps modem when 56 kbps modems came out. And, in turn, look what happened to the 56 kbps modem when DSL and cable technology became consumer-grade. Granted, these technologies took years to trickle from R&D to commercial to consumer, but artificial standards would have only slowed things down. Lets imagine what would have happened if "to put an end to cable chaos" for consumer desktop computer users, the EU had standardized the network interface card. The de facto standard in 1995, as I'm sure you remember, would have been the RJ-45 connector. The question that I would have to ask is how long would the additional legislation have taken to bring down the RJ-45 standard and replace it with RJ-11 so that consumers could start making the transition from dial-up modems to high-speed Internet? We see it in our legal system now where laws promote lobbyists and large lobbies have a lot of swing. When you have a consortium of companies that all make RJ-45 connectors and chips that talk dial-up - would RJ-11 have ever made the transition? In that 1995, the companies touting the benefits of higher speed through RJ-11 and Cat5 would have to not only overcome consumer skeptic, but also legal dead weight - neither of which is an easy obstacle to overcome. Worse yet, the RJ-45 consortium would only need to convince the legislators that the transition is bad - then the consumers would have never even seen the new technology. Additionally, when the hardware connector for USB 2.0 becomes too obsolete to allow faster data transfers, what happens with the legislation? How long will it be before new technology can start to compete? Will it even be worth while for any companies to undertake the R&D? If your design is not chosen by the legal team, you've wasted all of that time and money - you never even get the chance to vet your design against the public to see what they think. I would liken that to being administratively disqualified, even if your design was superior. The real judges never even got to evaluate your product.

I think Sony and Toshiba both have a couple of catastrophic design failures that prove that consumer support should be the guide, not legislative oversight. Let's look back on the failures of Betamax and HD-DVD. Betamax was technically superior to VHS, but Sony didn't want to play ball with the consumers. Now Betamax is nothing more than a blemish on A/V technology history. Similarly, the format wars between HD-DVD and Blu-ray had a short era of intense competition, but then the standard was chosen by people that were impacted by the technology - not by the government.

At a certain level, I believe this is how technology should be. As an engineer, I want to design things that people want to use. If the people want to use my product, I think they should ultimately be allowed to decide. I don't think the government should be levying requirements on the manufacturer to steer them towards other technology - especially under the guises of environmental good or consumer protection. The government is not only steering manufacturers towards a licensed technology, but they're also requiring the use of OLD technology. The micro-USB "B" form factor has been around for a long time in technology terms and, although it can be used to charge a USB 3.0 device - that's the limit of it's usefulness. As more consumer electronics start to adopt USB 3.0, we'll be left with another split market that will ultimately leave an electronic mess. At some point, people will stop wanting USB 2.0 cables altogether.

It's incredibly seductive to say that the government should step in and force all of the designs into one box, but the other danger to consider is the obtuseness of the government. Officials that aren't in touch with their constituency could potentially side with the lobbyists and not the people. Back in the original context, imagine if the officials are all loyal iPhone users - would everyone pushing for this commonality be happy if Lightning bolt was selected as the new standard? Every new Android, Tizen or Windows phone must now use Lightning bolt. Or better yet, why not make a common OS? That would be the pinnacle of interoperability and ease! The EU... no the world must now use Tizen!

I've seen what happens when the government makes technical decisions and it rarely works out efficiently. In this case, I honestly don't think "designed by committee" is something the people will enjoy if it is ever made official.

Ref:
[1] http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-%2f%2fEP%2f%2fTEXT%2bIM-PRESS%2b20130923IPR20617%2b0%2bDOC%2bXML%2bV0%2f%2fEN&language=EN
[2] http://www.technobuffalo.com/2013/09/29/microusb-mandatory-european-union/
[3] http://www.toshiba.com/us/accessories/Tablet-Power/USB-Charging-Cables/PA3996U-1CAB?src=ANEM&cm_mmc=SF_GooglePLS&CAWELAID=1466835490&catargetid=400007100000003265&cadevice=c&cagpspn=pla
[4] http://www.usb.org/developers/vendor/
[5] http://www.hdmi.org/manufacturer/terms.aspx
[6] http://www.usb.org/developers/usb20/faq20/